South Dakota

  Securities Lawyers.
HOME ABOUT US FAQ'S RESOURCES CONTACT US FREE CASE REVIEW
August 24, 2010
Securities
             
 
Selecting an attorney for legal cases is a very important decision. Please enter your information below to receive a Free Consultation from an attorney in your area:
 
Zip Code:   
 

Securities News

 


Statement of the Securities and Exchange Commission Concerning Financial Penalties


Washington, D.C., Jan. 4, 2006 – The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission today issued the following statement concerning financial penalties:

Today the Commission announced the filing of two settled actions against corporate issuers, SEC v. McAfee, Inc. and In the Matter of Applix, Inc. In one, the company will pay a civil money penalty; in the other, a penalty is not part of the settlement.

The question of whether, and if so to what extent, to impose civil penalties against a corporation raises significant questions for our mission of investor protection. The authority to impose such penalties is relatively recent in the Commission’s history, and the use of very large corporate penalties is more recent still. Recent cases have not produced a clear public view of when and how the Commission will use corporate penalties, and within the Commission itself a variety of views have heretofore been expressed, but not reconciled.

The Commission believes it important to provide the maximum possible degree of clarity, consistency, and predictability in explaining the way that its corporate penalty authority will be exercised. To this end, we are issuing this statement describing with particularity the framework for our penalty determinations in these two cases. We have issued these decisions, and this statement of principles, unanimously.

In determining whether or not to impose penalties against the corporations in these cases, we carefully considered our statutory authority, and the legislative history surrounding that statutory authority.

In 1990, Congress passed the Securities Enforcement Remedies and Penny Stock Reform Act (the “Remedies Act”), which gave the Commission authority generally to seek civil money penalties in enforcement cases.1 The penalty provisions added by the Remedies Act expressly authorize the Commission to obtain money penalties from entities, including corporate issuers. These provisions also enhanced the Commission’s authority to fine individuals. Today, we limit our discussion to penalties against corporations, although we view penalties against individual offenders as a critical component in punishing and deterring violative conduct.

Contact our South Dakota Securities Lawyer Now!

 
Did You Know?    
 
 
Variation Margin: Payment made on a daily or intraday basis
Variation Margin: Payment made on a daily or intraday basis by a clearing member to the clearing organization based on adverse price movement in positions carried by the clearing member, calculated separately for customer and proprietary positions.

 


  Securities News  
 


Latest news about securities cases in South Dakota and nationwide:

SEC Charges McAfee, Inc. with Accounting Fraud
McAfee consented, without admitting or denying the allegations of the complaint, to the entry of a Court order enjoining it from violating the anti...
Read more >


Federal Bank Propose Guidance On Commercial Real Estate Lending Companies
The federal bank and thrift regulatory agencies on Tuesday issued for comment proposed guidance on sound risk management practices for concentratio...
Read more >


Vermont to Receive $3.875 Million in Global Securities Settlement
mont – Nine major Wall Street brokerage firms have agreed to pay the State of Vermont $3.875 million in fines as part of an historic nationwide se...
Read more >


More Securities News >

 
 

Securities Terms

 


Tuesday's Term

Basis Grade

Definition:
The grade of a commodity used as the standard or par grade of a futures contract.

Aggregation

Definition:
The principle under which all futures positions owned or controlled by one trader (or group of traders acting in concert) are combined to determine reporting status and compliance with speculative position limits. See CFTC Backgrounder: Speculative Limits, Hedging, and Aggregation.

Backwardation

Definition:
Market situation in which futures prices are progressively lower in the distant delivery months. For instance, if the gold quotation for January is $360.00 per ounce and that for June is $355.00 per ounce, the backwardation for five months against January is $5.00 per ounce. (Backwardation is the opposite of contango ). See Inverted Market.

More Securities Terms >

 

Securities Resources

 


Search Securities resources in our resource center:

More Resources >

 

Securities Hot Topics

 
Topics Related to Securities:

  • Investment Fraud
  • Stock Fraud
  • Bond Fraud
  • Mutual Fund Fraud

More Securities Topics >

South Dakota Securities Attorney

 
If you live in the following cities and need an securities attorney you should contact our Securities Attorney as soon as possible:

  • Aberdeen
  • Brookings
  • Huron
  • Mitchell
  • Pierre
  • Rapid City
  • Sioux Falls
  • Spearfish
  • Vermillion
  • Watertown
  • Yankton
 


Legal Disclaimers
All attorney listings are a paid attorney advertisement, and do not in any way constitute a referral or endorsement by an approved or authorized lawyer referral service. The information provided on South Dakota Securities Lawyers.com is not intended to be legal advice, but merely conveys general information related to legal issues commonly encountered. Your access to and use of this website is subject to additional Terms and Conditions.

Local Professional? Generate new business today
Call 866-227-9356 or contact a sales rep


This site is part of the LawFirms.com Network
©2010 ExpertHub, wholly owned subsidiary of MoxyMedia, Inc.